We are not melancholy or advocates of pessimism or looking for a distortion of the image because we are among the first to praise this picture and we are looking for its completeness, but our characteristic, which is the description of observation and observation, and even history, we have to capture the reality as it is in the case without having an interest with or against and the reality of the situation foretells committing The Supreme Committee for Elections, for some deficiencies, would not have fallen into it, including what happened in Giza Governorate, the most prominent of which are: -

- Failure to respect Judicial Decision No. 2644 of 60 BC issued by the Administrative Court of non-applicability of the status of a farmer to the right of the candidate Tawfiq al-Husseini al-Khawaja, and the order to continue in the lists of candidates under the status of workers and farmers despite the issuance of another ruling by the Administrative Court in Case No. 3342 of 60 BC rejecting the problem And continue to implement and in the face of this candidate.

This ruling has concluded that the administrative body has to implement the ruling mentioned above and does not plant any problem that takes place before a civil court, as it is a material obstacle without effect.

- Refrain from implementing the ruling issued by the Administrative Court to select the description of the farmer in the candidate Mustafa Sayed Ahmed Subaih “The Al-Qanater facility”. The Supreme Administrative Court rejected the appeal lodged by this candidate by consensus in Appeal No. 3041 of 52 BC at the session of 6/11/2005 However, the Supreme Elections Committee neglected this and ordered the member to continue running for the nomination until they reached the run-off stage, which foretells that this defect will inevitably lead to the nullity of the elections and be a basis for stopping the announcement of the result in the event that it is challenged on the grounds of cancellation. Pursuant to the established rules of our Supreme Court which ruled, “If the elections are held in contradiction to what the enforceable judicial rulings have pronounced regarding the candidate’s capacity or the conditions for nomination, even if they are contested before the Supreme Court as long as their implementation has not been suspended, their results are tainted with a lack of legitimacy and the decision issued to announce the result is absent. These elections are to the extent that it is absolutely null and void.

- The committee's failure to allow some organizations the right to observe in implementation of the historic administrative judiciary ruling No. 2627 of the year 60 BC and its requirement to coordinate with the National Council for Human Rights despite the pronouncement of the verdict and reasons for the right to control without mediation.

- The Supreme Committee did not investigate the accuracy when announcing the screening result in the Imbaba district by announcing that candidate Jamal Al-Saftawi received 4,310 votes, while these votes belonged to the candidate Abdel Moneim Emara. And the candidate, Abdel Moneim Emara, is still trying to correct the situation, to no avail.

We will continue to monitor this and everything related to the electoral process since its inception in our final report.